Portbou Fire 2012 — Traffic exposure during two simultaneous fires

Portbou · Alt Empordà · Catalonia · Spain · 22–24 July 2012

Bombers recorded a 45-hectare fire at Portbou on 22 July. Its response was affected by a second emergency already underway inland. Closures of the N-II and AP-7 in the Figueres–La Jonquera corridor had redirected northbound traffic, and the N-260 at Portbou was heavily congested when the fire arrived. The small burn footprint and the concentration of people on that road describe different dimensions of the emergency.

Traffic and fire chronology

Recorded milestones for the two concurrent incidents
Date and local timeEventIncident
22 July, 12:54AlertLa Jonquera
22 July, 19:05Alert, 6 h 11 min after the La Jonquera alertPortbou
22 July, 22:01Control phasePortbou
23 July, 01:00Controlled, 5 h 55 min after alertPortbou
24 July, 08:50ExtinguishedPortbou

The Portbou report describes the first crews protecting people, vehicles and a service station on the N-260, then rescuing people who had fled downslope. With additional vehicles the crews tackled the right flank. French firefighters and aircraft helped with the tail and the left flank. The report links the flank behaviour to the ridge between Cerbère and Portbou and describes where the wind and a low-fuel strip slowed part of the fire. Bombers Portbou incident analysis, strategy and priorities

What a regional incident ledger needs to record

The road closures changed where travellers were exposed before the Portbou alert. A regional reconstruction can preserve that link by recording the closure on the La Jonquera timeline and the resulting traffic conditions on the Portbou timeline. The two fires have separate entries in the campaign review and different alert and control times. Bombers La Jonquera incident analysis · Bombers 2012 campaign review, major incidents table

Evidence limits

The time intervals come from the two recorded alerts and the Portbou status changes. The available documents describe congestion and the sequence of priorities. Estimating the number of exposed road users or comparing the effects of alternative diversions would require traffic counts and more precise closure records.